CANADIAN ORTHODONTICS PRACTICE: BRACING FOR PATIENTS Janice Eliasson, Brent Snider, and Peggy Hedges wrote this exercise solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized, or otherwise reproduced in any form or by any means without the permission of the copyright holder. Reproduction of this material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction rights organization. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Ivey Business School, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 0N1; (t) 519.661.3208; (e) c..s@ivey.ca; www.iveypublishing.ca. Our goal is to publish materials of the highest quality; submit any errata to p..s@ivey.ca. Copyright © 2022, Ivey Business School Foundation Version: 2022-04-27 Dr. Jay Jayson sat down in his office, sipping a hot cup of coffee in preparation for what was sure to be another busy day in his well-established orthodontic practice. He loved seeing the smiles of his patients gradually improve throughout their treatment plans, but he especially enjoyed the final treatment appointment, when everything was removed and patients saw the finished results for the first time. It was rewarding to be part of personal improvement transformations that would last a lifetime! Although Jayson was reasonably comfortable with the operations of his practice, his desire for patientfocused care meant that he was always looking for ways to improve Canadian Orthodontics Practice (COP)—both from the patients’ perspective and from his own. While patient flow and capacity had rarely been discussed in his orthodontic training, Jayson’s interest in these areas had recently increased; he hoped to grow the practice and was considering various alternatives that would also help balance his workload. As he waited for his first appointment of the morning, he wondered how he should prioritize the options: hiring more registered dental assistants (RDAs), renovating the treatment area, or even partnering with a second orthodontist. What results could he expect to see from each option or combination of options? Jayson had been pondering the best way forward almost every morning recently. And just like most mornings, the first of his many patients arrived before he could even finish his coffee. After the last patient of the day left, Jayson decided that since mornings always seem rushed, he would take some time to organize his thoughts before taking his children to their evening sporting activities. He thought it might be a good idea to first go through the treatment process from beginning to end. He knew the reception environment was comfortable, and that the patients felt confident in their treatment and the process, but he was concerned about the impact on patients of any delays in care. Occasionally, patients were late, or processes took longer than anticipated, and this delayed the care of subsequent patients. He knew that scheduling everything to the maximum was not the best approach, but he also did not want to underutilize his RDAs or even himself. It was a constant balancing act. PATIENT PROCESS Most of Jayson’s patients brought someone with them to their appointments. The majority of his patients were young teenagers, who were frequently accompanied by their parents, but of his adult patients (who made up about 30 per cent of the practice), many also brought someone along. His clinic was located in a medical For the exclusive use of H. Qiu, 2023. Most patients checked in for their appointments on one of the wall-mounted computers and waited comfortably to be called. During a recent renovation of the waiting area, the practice had added video games along one wall, a cozy fireplace along another wall, and a popular free beverage centre with hot and cold drink options (see Exhibit 1a). After a patient checked in, one of the RDAs came and took them to one of the six dedicated treatment chairs. A bench adjacent to the treatment chair was available for those who accompanied the patient; these people were also free to remain in the comfortable waiting area (see Exhibit 1b for a picture of one side of the treatment area, and Exhibit 2 for a simplified diagram of the full treatment area). The patient’s process consisted of three steps: 1. They spent four minutes with the RDA, who prepared the patient for the orthodontist’s examination by settling the patient in and discussing any new concerns. 2. They spent up to five minutes with Jayson, who determined the recommended treatment; this could include follow-up appointment timing, which the RDA recorded on the wall-mounted computer. 3. Next, the RDA spent eight minutes implementing the procedures prescribed by the orthodontist: reattaching the wires to the braces, tightening to the specified target, or showing the patient how to put on elastics. Jayson’s thoughts turned to the RDAs, since they stayed with the patients the entire time. For an RDA, the process lasted about three more minutes after each patient left while they sterilized the chair and prepared the working area for the next patient. Throughout the day, each RDA would continue to treat patients at a single assigned treatment chair. After treatment, each patient would book their next appointment at the reception desk. Depending on their treatment needs, approximately one-third of patients would have three-week recall appointments, another third would be back in a month, and the final third would have six weeks until their next appointment. Jayson had set up the schedule to try to make ongoing appointments as convenient as possible. The practice was open Monday to Thursday, and Jayson dedicated three times during the day to shorter appointments: before work and school, during lunch break, and late in the day. The rest of the day was dedicated to new patient consultations and appointments to either put on new braces or remove braces after the treatment was complete. He was comfortably busy, as patients were scheduled into most of the time slots, four days a week. The new patient consultation room included a treatment chair, so a new patient could be comfortably positioned for their initial assessment and then sit comfortably in the chair as treatment alternatives were presented. Although the primary purpose of the consultation room treatment chair was new patient assessment, Jayson considered using it as a treatment chair for his regular patients if necessary. With his notes on the current facility and processes completed, Jayson began thinking about key questions he wanted answered to help guide his future decision-making: Would hiring more RDAs help him treat more patients? Was there a way more patients could be seen without renovating the treatment area? Jayson realized that the answers to these questions about any actions he should or should not take would require deeper analysis and reflection. He quickly filled a blank note pad with details about the following aspects of his concerns: For the exclusive use of H. Qiu, 2023. This document is authorized for use only by Hana Qiu in 2023. Page 3 W26090 Service Features Although the most important aspect of a professional service business was the competency of the consultant (e.g., the orthodontist), service industries were often judged by other criteria, as patients could not assess their technical quality. What were some key service features currently in place at Canadian Orthodontics Practice? Were there any opportunities for improvement in the service experience? Process Analysis A process flowchart diagram of the treatment process (see Exhibit 3 for an explanation of key operations management terms) showing durations and resource requirements for each step (e.g., RDA, treatment chair, etc.) would provide insight into some key decision-making metrics, specifically the following: How long was the RDA busy per standard appointment? How long was the patient busy? How long was the orthodontist busy? What was the patient’s throughput time (i.e., their entire time in the system)? RDA Capacity Analysis A grid-timeline template charting one hour each of some possible scenarios would provide even greater understanding of key capacity metrics. For example, what was the utilization of the RDAs and the orthodontist? What was the cycle time (i.e., the average time between completions of successive units/patients)? What was the bottleneck (limiting factor) in the process? What was the capacity (i.e., how many patients could be treated in a one-hour interval) under the following scenarios? with only one RDA with two RDAs using all six chairs (i.e., with six RDAs) (determined without the grid) What was the best number of RDAs to schedule? What were the advantages and disadvantages of that recommendation from the perspectives of the orthodontist and RDAs and from the perspective of the patient? Hiring a Second Orthodontist Jayson was considering hiring a second orthodontist, and this possibility had many potential implications. Among these, he would need to consider the following: Besides capacity, what other factors would he need to consider before hiring a second orthodontist? What would the system capacity be with two orthodontists and six RDAs/treatment chairs used? What would be the capacity with two orthodontists and seven RDAs (using the consultation room as a treatment chair)? What were the advantages and disadvantages of these combinations from the perspectives of the orthodontists and RDAs and from the perspective of the patient? For the exclusive use of H. Qiu, 2023. This document is authorized for use only by Hana Qiu in 2023. Page 4 W26090 EXHIBIT 1: CANADIAN ORTHODONTICS PRACTICE OFFICE PHOTOS a) Waiting Area b) Treatment Chairs c) Consultation Room Source: With permission, company documents. EXHIBIT 2: SIMPLIFIED LAYOUT Source: Created by the exercise authors. For the exclusive use of H. Qiu, 2023. This document is authorized for use only by Hana Qiu in 2023. Page 5 W26090 EXHIBIT 3: TERMINOLOGY Process: any part of an organization that transformed inputs into outputs (in this case, the output was a treated patient) Process flowchart: a visual representation of a process Bottleneck/constraint: the slowest part of a process, which limited other parts (e.g., the number of patients that could be treated) Cycle time: the average time between the completion of two consecutive units (e.g., patients treated) Capacity throughput rate, or flow rate: the maximum output in a period; this was determined by the bottleneck process—in this case, the orthodontist or the RDAs, depending on the chosen clinic configuration chosen (assuming adequate patient demand) Processing time: the time to produce an order (e.g., a patient arriving to the clinic and being treated) Throughput time: the average time for a unit to move through the system, which was made up of the processing time plus delays (which could happen, in this case, if either the RDA or orthodontist got behind schedule) Utilization: the ratio of time that a resource was activated relative to the available time; a utilization of 100 per cent allowed for no variation, and in this exercise, utilization varied depending on the clinic configuration chosen Note: RDA = registered dental assistant Source: Adapted by the exercise authors from F. Robert Jacobs and Richard B. Chase, Operations and Supply Chain Management:
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.
Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications and future communication.
1. Click on the “Place order tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER INFORMATION" section and click “PRICE CALCULATION” at the bottom to calculate your order price.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
Need this assignment or any other paper?
Click here and claim 25% off
Discount code SAVE25